“No More Income Taxes!” – The 10% Trump Tariff Explained

Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code GRAHAM at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: | Let's talk about the Donald Trump Tariff Plan and how this could affect the economy in 2025 – Enjoy! Add me on Instagram: GPStephan

GET MY WEEKLY EMAIL MARKET RECAP NEWSLETTER:

WHAT IS A TARIFF:
A tariff is essentially an extra "tax" imposed when importing goods from one country to another, designed to make foreign products more expensive and encourage consumers to buy locally, which benefits the domestic economy. However, it's important to note that this 'tax' is paid by the person or company importing the products – not by the country that makes the product. So, if Apple imports from China – Apple is responsible for paying the tariff – not China.

BENEFITS OF TARIFFS:
-They protect US Companies from Foreign Competition.
-Increased Job Growth.
-Higher Government Revenue.
-Favorable Trade Negotiations.

DOWNSIDES OF TARIFFS:
-Higher Prices For Everyone
-Retaliation From Other Countries
-A Decline In Economic Growth
-Less Competition Could Lead to Less Innovation

TARIFFS IN 2025:
On November 25th, it was announced that Trump would enact an executive order to create “an additional 10% tariff on Chinese imports, as well as an additional 25 percent tariff on Mexico and Canada.” These tariffs would continue until China, Mexico, and Canada addressed the movement of 'bad things' and undocumented people across the US border – and, the impact could be pretty significant.

After all, in response to these announcements, “Canada and Mexico said that they would retaliate with tariffs on U.S. products if tariffs on their U.S. exports were imposed” – and, as you would expect, China reflected the same sentiment, shortly after. Mexico’s president even said that “neither threats nor tariffs will solve the issue of migration or consumption of bad things." (I made this PG for YouTube).

IMPACTS:
If history is any indication, Trump can move forward with tariffs using rather specific law, they wouldn’t be the “economic boom” that some people think it would be, and instead, it’s said that “The measures proposed could hit a number of strategic US industrial sectors hard, add approximately $272 billion a year to tax burdens, raise goods prices, lift interest rates, and sap strength in an already-vulnerable household sector.”

To make matters worse, in terms of existing tariffs: In 2022, they generated $80 BILLION DOLLARS for the US Government – which, was just 2% of all tax revenue – enough to keep the government running for just 15 days. This pretty much suggests that it would be IMPOSSIBLE to fund the US government with tariffs alone, and this is purely ‘wishly thinking’ with no chance of actually becoming a reality.

WHY TARIFFS NEXT YEAR?
The reality probably lies somewhere in the fact that the upcoming administration believes that our reliance on China is seen as a bad thing, both economically and politically – and, he could threaten tariffs as a way to negotiate a more favorable trade deal for the United States.

The YouTube Creator Academy:
Learn EXACTLY how to get your first 1000 subscribers on YouTube, rank videos on the front page of searches, grow your following, and turn that into another income source: – $100 OFF WITH CODE 100OFF

My ENTIRE Camera and Recording Equipment:

For business inquiries, you can reach me at grahamstephanbusiness@gmail.com

*Some of the links and other products that appear on this video are from companies which Graham Stephan will earn an affiliate commission or referral bonus. Graham Stephan is part of an affiliate network and receives compensation for sending traffic to partner sites. The content in this video is accurate as of the posting date. Some of the offers mentioned may no longer be available. This is not investment advice.

Mano Kamgang
 

  • @GrahamStephan says:

    Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code GRAHAM at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: https://incogni.com/graham

  • @humphrey says:

    thanks for always keeping us informed graham!

  • @cartertaylor2297 says:

    Is anyone actually watching the vid before commenting? All I am seeing is blind acceptance of the policy without actually refuting any of the points Graham made.

    • @GrahamStephan says:

      Initially, people click on the video and make a quick assumption based on the title without actually watching. I really tried to cover pros / cons and give a thorough overview / history – I don’t think this really sways one way or another, besides cutting government waste.

    • @cartertaylor2297 says:

      ⁠yeah that’s fair, guess it’s just a YouTube comments thing haha

    • @HomeEngineer-wm5fg says:

      @10:30 what Steven gets wrong is that our products are already tariffed to high heaven overseas…….so Trumps argument is if our products are tariffed, we can match their tariffs.

    • @willharris5562 says:

      That’s the trump mafia way, blindly accept a trump policy or lie and attack anyone who uses common sense to analyze it

    • @NicMercy says:

      @@GrahamStephan Personally, I believe that cuts are not the only necessary action. I believe the government also needs to increase it’s income. Yes that means tax increases for higher income individuals and closing tax evading loopholes. I also think that corporations SHOULD get tax incentives… IF 80% of their employees are U.S. citizens and paid a livable wage. My stance is, if you’re a corporation that wants to do business in the United States, and you want those sweet sweet tax breaks, you need to provide employment with fair compensation to our citizens.

  • @JakeVanderPloeg says:

    The idea behind tariffs are that consumers will be less incentivized to buy foreign goods and thus they’ll buy domestic products. In theory this makes sense but in reality tariffs are either paid by American companies that import the same foreign goods or materials that they were importing before the tariffs and so they’re then required to pass that additional expense onto the consumer or the consumer ends up being forced to pay for the more expensive domestically produced good rather than the cheaper foreign made ones. It also creates barriers to trade with our allies and hurts relationships with other countries. It often time causes other countries to retaliate and put tariffs on our exports. If another country makes something more efficiently than us and we make something more efficiently than them, that’s good trade that benefits everybody and should be encouraged. They are a tax increase that benefits nobody except very highly targeted industries of US producers and politicians trying to appeal to American voters that don’t know basic economics

    • @joshuadelaughter says:

      For industries where there are already US based manufacturers though, it suddenly makes the American ones a lot more competitive. And tariffs are nothing new. Not sure why Americans are so adverse to the idea. Pretty much every other developed country in the world uses them.

    • @itskino8324 says:

      ​@joshuadelaughter A lot of it has to do with people like their cheap items after the last couple years of inflation, I don’t want prices to go up even more

    • @RanDom-if2ee says:

      @@JakeVanderPloeg Wonderful explanation.

    • @JakeVanderPloeg says:

      @@RanDom-if2ee Thank you! I’m very passionate about economics!😆

    • @RanDom-if2ee says:

      @@JakeVanderPloeg I can tell! Thank you for taking the time to type this well thought out piece👍

  • @RanDom-if2ee says:

    Dang, i have never seen such a big creator engage with their community so much. You reply and heart a LOT of comments. Thank you for that.

  • @mikejones8667 says:

    Love how u tied the video together with the government spending. That’s where we should be looking at first.

  • @Okami400 says:

    One thing we can all agree on, cut government wasteful spending.

    • @brettweltz8135 says:

      Call it what it is government money laundering.

    • @trevorallen5948 says:

      yes but we do not all agree on HOW and WHO should do that. So far it looks like the VA could be a target of DOGE and if any more social programs get targeted it could be bad. If they make defense contractors stop charging the government $299 for a screw, yay doge.

    • @NinlilsLittleEnby says:

      This feels like an impossible task. You can’t eliminate greed, so the only thing to take money from (if not politicians/lobbiest pockets) are generally useful programs and services. Plus constantly yelling “less government spending!” Only drives us further away from a half decent universal healthcare system, which EVERYONE seems to want granted to response to the UHC CEO incident

    • @blanco-sanchez450 says:

      Wasteful and fraudulent spending. Audit and track spending to private government contractors and nonprofits.

    • @ronnyyoung7253 says:

      Pentagon is notorious for this. But no one wants to talk about reducing the Military budget. It needs to be addressed.

  • @kemikunle9360 says:

    This video is truly an exceptional, apolitical synopsis with excellent history contextualization! Awesome, thanks!

  • @stuartnochance says:

    A) tariffs raise the prices on imported goods. Government collects tariff money from imports.

    B) American companies raise their own prices to be just a bit below the tariffed imports.

    C) everyone pays more for these products.

    D) once people shift to domestic products, tariff revenues go down.

    E) assuming domestic producers do hire more people, and income tax is deleted, even less income to government.

    Yes, government spending should be scrutinized to get rid of inefficiency and waste. Yet why do musk et al want to target social security while not paying attention to crazy military spending? Because shareholders make a lot of money on military contracts, but none on social security.

    • @bradharris1459 says:

      Govt spending should be based solely on tariffs….if alot isn’t collected, reduce the size appropriately. It has to be ran like a business.

    • @MatthewSouza says:

      You should check out Analyzing Finance with Nick, he did a great job highlighting military spending in a recent video and his research is very thorough.

    • @perporiap9364 says:

      A local product… as great it sounds it is quite impossible to imagine a shift! Imaging not buying a 2$ strainer from Temu whereas the US version local one is 15$.

    • @canejuicemaui4355 says:

      Musk sucks

    • @iluvtododrawrings says:

      So everything on amazon goes up 25% and if there is a US version then it is just 20% more expensive?
      No thanks.

  • @johnl9135 says:

    Doesn’t matter how you slice and dice it Graham, at the end of the day the consumers are the ones hurting.

    • @descensiongrime6409 says:

      Stop consuming

    • @user-zo2ge3oe8d says:

      @@descensiongrime6409 lol for real. It doesn’t even occur to them.

    • @AdrianSimmonsJr. says:

      Lmao you think everyone has the ability to become self sufficient and no longer grocery shop or engage with literally any imported goods?😂 citizens foot the bill of any tariffs put in place at the end of the day

    • @Matthew-.- says:

      Idk how people are already forgetting he did tariffs in his first term and the economy was doing amazing by almost every metric until COVID. So it does in fact matter how you slice it and dice it.

    • @RockyStaffy12 says:

      @@Matthew-.-yea ok ask the farmers that

  • @the1andonlycorbin says:

    A major problem with tariffs are once they are implemented, they are hard to get rid of. We still have tariffs from many decades ago placed on items that are no threat to domestic production. In today’s global society, so many items are produced using parts from multiple countries that if these sweeping tariffs are implemented, pretty much the cost of everything will go up.

    • @tsuki_moon.1 says:

      Lmao good times to skip usa as market partner

    • @thecrackin-u8p says:

      Biden loved trumps tariffs so much, he kept those 😂

    • @jasonscst says:

      Replace tariff with income tax and everything still applies.

      Tariffs can, and are, changed quite quickly

    • @rb239rtr says:

      USA still has a 25% chicken tax on German utility vans since the 1960s.

    • @dcouwlier says:

      You as a consumer can decide where to spend your money at/on. We are taxed to death here and you clowns want more taxes. Income, sales, luxury, gas, property.
      How many times does a car have to be taxed once the original tax has been paid? Government says every time you sell one it has to be taxed again. Homes too.
      The government is out of control.

  • @leok7193 says:

    Tariffs are GUARANTEED to raise prices and increase inflation. Absolute certainty.

    There’s a small chance, fingers crossed, and all, that they create enough local manufacturing to offset inflation. Unlikely, though, and doesn’t help those of us already employed and not looking to own or work in manufacturing.

    • @sammay9961 says:

      I don’t even think we can cross our fingers hoping for that. the purpose of tariffs is making things more expensive so the rest will be competitive. if the prices don’t change the tariff is pointless

    • @BimmerBros says:

      It’s pie in the sky, the global economies will likely retaliate with their own tariffs and then we’re all back to square one, except everything is a little more expensive for everyone, and some industries will completely disappear and reappear in different countries 😂

    • @leok7193 says:

      So, people here understand it. How does a Wharton grad not? Did he learn something from all his scams and bankruptcies that legitimate economists that study monetary policy for a living did not learn?

    • @will-zj5gq says:

      lol it’s like yall forgot trump was president before and did all these things already and we were fine.🤣🤣🤣

    • @will-zj5gq says:

      @@BimmerBrosnot true at all. america is the largest consumer market in the world. losing american customers for global companies would destroy their business. minus china you could combine all the rest of the consumer markets in the world together and they still wouldn’t match the united states market.

  • @avres13 says:

    Seems like an excuse for companies to continue to price gouge and more than they already are…

    • @panda.paradox.91 says:

      The federal income tax is the big one you need to watch out for. Bernie’s absolutely right on this—it would be the biggest wealth transfer in history if Trump got rid of it. His tariffs could throw us into a recession (depending on how reckless he gets with them), but no federal income tax would leave the country completely unrecognizable.

    • @mikeb.2925 says:

      Just like the supply chain issues during covid was a great excuse to skyrocket prices and never bring them back down despite the obvious overproduction we’re currently at.

    • @Squizzly says:

      @@mikeb.2925massive overproduction. No corporate profit margin regulations at all

    • @klosnj11 says:

      Businesses will sell what they have for as much as they think they can get for it. Always.

      The reason prices have been rising is largely due to manipulation of the money supply by the federal reserve durring the pandemic, combined with a breakdown of supply chain.

    • @mythcurcheckit says:

      ​@mikeb.2925 look up how much money was added to the money supply during 2020 and 2021. It was 100%. If I make 2x of something it becomes less valuable. But ya, let’s blame companies who adjusted their prices.

  • @ebony_shogun-7796 says:

    Everyone can agree that wasteful spending should be stopped. Now we all need to agree on what is ‘wasteful spending’.

  • @frostkiller says:

    Income tax was never even supposed to be a thing.

    • @geodude7116 says:

      It’s a thing in every country in the world.

    • @CiiaraLee says:

      Your right. People don’t get it still

    • @CruxBrie says:

      Remember there is no temporary tax

    • @kolegiles500 says:

      This. Adding tariffs in the great depression is NOT a good example because income tax wasn’t a thing back then and therefore people didn’t have extra money to spend on more expensive goods. Nowadays, with everyone receiving 15-30% back in their paycheck, they can afford higher priced goods that THEY decide to buy. It’s all about the freedom to choose what to buy with your money. Not the govt. taking it and wasting it. Not sure why this is so hard to understand.

    • @kolegiles500 says:

      assuming they do away with income tax****

  • @sallyprzybil2404 says:

    The prices of related but untarriffed products will go up also……look at what happened when they tariffed washing machines…not only did the price of washing machines go up..but also the prices of dryers, an untarriffed product, also went up!

    • @SmashKing17 says:

      They tariffed washing machines because China was selling cheaper machines. And putting American companies out of business they tariffed China and saved American businesses and jobs and made the market competitive again

  • @charlieinabox1164 says:

    I’ll take 40% of my income back for 40% on material goods I don’t want. Let me decide how to spend my money.

  • @demonshadows1 says:

    So companies we want to pay more taxes, will be forced to pay the federal government, so we don’t pay the federal government. while we are free to use the money we earn, to buy things we want, based on our own judgment rather than on what’s cheaper. All the while, allowing our local business an equal playing field against companies using slave labor.

    • @Kevin-vb2md says:

      Except the companies won’t eat the costs of the tariffs so instead of having the option for $5 Chinese toy and a $10 American toy you have to spend $10 no matter what. Thus increasing the cost of everything

    • @AdamDooley says:

      Of course, there will be the American market reaction where locally made goods will also increase their prices a little because they no longer have to compete against such a large discrepancy.

    • @kimberlynparsons7709 says:

      Sounds awful 😮

    • @NateSmokes816 says:

      No, thats not what that means, at all.

    • @demonshadows1 says:

      @@AdamDooley sounds like a competitive market and capitalism would fix that due to competition. It’s not communist China where they fix prices.

  • @austinballard7792 says:

    Former veteran here. We had a budget for our unit on base. if leadership didnt spend the full amount, they were fearful the budget would be less the next year. That drove them to be frivolous, and buy whatever they could, even if that didnt benefit us. Wasteful military spending is a huge issue that goes without notice.

    • @JustinCredible-x1w says:

      I have a buddy in the coast guard who told me they dumped whole helicopters in the ocean for just that reason

    • @austinballard7792 says:

      Maybe Graham will bring awareness of this issue. not sure if it’s covered on the news. Its very sad considering I was proud to serve our country.

    • @GnarlsBarkley123 says:

      Navy veteran here and I FULLY agree with every word. I was in for almost 10 years and even trying to be cost effective was frown upon, it’s really bad still.

    • @yeshuaislord7773 says:

      Exactly

  • @nomansland6376 says:

    I’d rather have higher prices on items purchased where I have a choice of what I buy than payroll tax where I have no choice but to pay it.

  • >