NAR JUST SAID WHAAAAT ABOUT STEERING?

Take the next Set More Listing Appointments Challenge:

Watch these:
LIST YOUR FIRST MILLION DOLLAR HOME

THE BIGGEST LIE REAL ESTATE AGENTS BELEIVE

Ricky Carruth ๐Ÿ’Ž Real Estate Broker, Coach, Investor, Father & Husband! He travels around the county with his amazing wife & daughter speaking on the biggest stages about real estate & success.

Ricky closed over 1,000 deals as a solo real estate agent in Gulf Shores, AL, fix & flipped over 100 homes & built a $10M real estate portfolio (adding new properties every month).

He has successfully predicted the market every step of the way since early 2020 including the market surge of 2021, the home price bottom of January 2023 & new all-time highs for home prices in July 2023.

Ricky started coaching real estate agents in 2017, and has become one of the biggest names in the industry.

Message him on IG: rickycarruth

Mano Kamgang
 

  • @VincentCosta says:

    The language in our new buyer agency agreement in NJ gives the buyer the option to opt out of seeing homes where they have to pay above X commission out of pocket.

  • @gotmikedaniels says:

    So true Ricky! Buyers will steer themselves. If two identical units are for sale and one of the listings is offering a commission to the buyer agent, that listing will sell faster bc the buyer isnโ€™t going to voluntarily pay their agent a commission. Buyers will steer themselves.

    • @iamlatroshia says:

      Thatโ€™s exactly what I was going to say. Iโ€™ve been showing homes at 0% because buyers have signed my buyers agreement.

    • @realtorjuanita says:

      Buyers have been voluntarily paying commissions in the listing price!

    • @SusanLowesRealtor says:

      โ€‹โ€‹@@realtorjuanita sort of, indirectly. The seller is the one who signed the listing agreement with the listing broker who pays the other side. If the funds at the table are not enough to cover commissions, the seller has to bring it. Seen it several times in the 2008 years… not in short sale.

    • @gotmikedaniels says:

      Yup.

    • @realtorjuanita says:

      @@SusanLowesRealtor Bottom line is that the buyer has been paying for both sides of the commission in their loan, otherwise the buyer and seller would individually pay their broker/brokerage from their own funds. Paying for both sides of the commission in the loan also inflates the home value. Why should a buyer have to get a loan that includes both agents commissions, if they can pay for their agentโ€™s commission outside of the loan or only their agentโ€™s commission in the loan. The same could be said for the seller, therefore lowering the purchase price. Lots to think about in the coming months.

  • @dialdominic says:

    I don’t understand how a world where less transparency benefits any buyer or seller. I am glad to meet with a buyer and get employed, but I don’t think that the buyer’s agent fee being offered by a seller should be obscured anywhere. It should be clear and transparently shared.

    • @JeepdudeFL says:

      Correct, but they have to bastardize the system to support the conspiracy verdict and make it appear that sellers are not paying the buyers agent.

  • @auctionman707 says:

    How are CMAs done now, since we will not know if the price included buyers comp ๐Ÿค”

  • @Gomessellshomes162 says:

    The fact that the commission cannot be anywhere on the MLS where will agents find out what the commission per home is? Will the brokers have a separate web page where commissions will be posted? Calling each agent to ask will be a nightmare.

  • @genasharpe6678 says:

    What I’m wondering is if when we are researching comps to get this data, will the mls have the info on what commissions were paid after closing?

  • @PremierAdvantageRE says:

    This is so stupid you all need to quit NAR

  • @vacationhomeclub says:

    Think through this scenarioโ€ฆ You take a listing, a buyer without an agent asks to view and then make an offer on the property. They refuse to pay any buyer compensation. Are you as the listing agent going to work for free and help the buyer write a psa and complete the transaction? Are you obligated to?

    • @patronsoldit6602 says:

      If you want to get paid you will. You’re the listing agent, you only get paid when the home sells. So tell me, if that’s your one offer, what are you going to do?

    • @k0cab says:

      Could you go over that possible scenario with your seller upfront at listing agreement signing to get an extra x% if you assist the buyer as well? Someone thatโ€™s already seeing your value as a listing agent would want you to be compensated for additional work.

    • @brookswrld says:

      โ€‹@@k0cab the seller is back to paying more commission in that scenario. May as well offer the buyer commission upfront and get more offers.

    • @user-ep2ow1nm2m says:

      My listing agreement states upfront what the seller owes me if I have to pay another agent , if I bring the buyer, or if the seller brings the buyer. No surprises.

  • @NathanMartin-zn3bi says:

    NAR has left the chat

  • @ShuckersFan says:

    Iโ€™ve been calling it economic steering since the settlement came out but no one thought it would happen. Oopsโ€ฆ

  • @aarongarmonRealtor says:

    We gone be alright.

  • @Jschultz1221 says:

    The settlement is such a JOKE!! CLASS ACTION ATTORNEYS ARE CRIMINALS.

    • @iamlatroshia says:

      Thatโ€™s who won ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿพโ€โ™€๏ธ

    • @KaterinaGasset says:

      They are and they make a killing! Look it up! There are even documentaries on how these class action lawyers work – no comparison as to how agents works

  • @COArsenal says:

    NAR is a laughable collection of clowns. The plaintiffs had no idea how this industry operated and they, and every seller who ever thought they were going to save money on their listings, is going to regret the day this was ever started.

  • @johnderperez says:

    “What we do now is worth more than the amount of money we get paid.” ๐Ÿ‘

  • @millaillagorilla4935 says:

    It’s getting crazy…it looks like with all these changes they are trying to create a market crash…here in Maryland they just passed renter rights where the security deposit is limited to the 1st months rent.

  • @biggerscranerealestategroup says:

    Best explanation Iโ€™ve seen on exactly how screwed up this settlement and the ultimate new rules are going to be for our industry.
    – removes transparency
    – creates real steering
    – confuses the consumer
    – frustrates brokerages

    Real questionโ€ฆ. Why canโ€™t we have our buyer client sign a waiver/disclosure stating they do not want to pay any commissions out of pocket and do not wish to see any properties where the seller isnโ€™t paying their buyer agentโ€™s full commission agreed to in the buyer rep agreement. Wouldnโ€™t that eliminate any possibility of buyer agent steering?

    Alsoโ€ฆ.why not have different versions of buyer rep agreements with the same buyer client? The only difference is in the BAC.

    And finallyโ€ฆ. If the buyer rep agreements can be amendedโ€ฆ..NONE OF THIS EVEN MATTERS!!!

  • @geoffrey-long says:

    Thereโ€™s a big difference between a listing agent advising a seller of economic abilities of buyers in certain markets and price points to pay agent compensation and saying โ€œyou better offer compensation or else nobody will look at your house.โ€ One is exactly what we should be doing and the other is why we got sued and lost. The nuance in that matters and is important. The FAQ is clear that you can advise sellers on how buyers may react to different compensation models. But you canโ€™t say, โ€œoffer compensation or buyers agents wonโ€™t show your property.โ€ This was at the heart of the lawsuit and agents need to understand this.

  • @courtneybass says:

    Agents need alternative MLS and break up the NAR monopoly.

  • @Homesncooking says:

    I must work in la la landโ€ฆ. I have worked with buyers and sellers โ€” did many relocations for a large Bio Tech company โ€” never in my years did I see STEERINGโ€ฆ commissions were factored into the sales price which was fully understood – so in essence BUYERS were paying their agents commission as it was included in purchase priceโ€ฆ. I never once did NOT show a home that had a say 2% commission when standard of market was2.5%. . I never once saw a group of realtors having a COLLUSION meetingโ€ฆ The MLS MADE the commissions transparentโ€ฆ. Now its a โ€œbehind the scenesโ€ with phone calls to listing agentsโ€”. Who is to say what those phone calls will disclose??? The are fixing what at least in MY market was NOT broken. And BTW multi million dollar homes MOST OFTEN HAD NEGOTIATED COMMISSIONS ALREADY!

  • @diegoibarluciarealestate says:

    Ricky, your insights have shaped my real estate journey immensely. Your focus on relationships over transactions is transformative. Despite NAR’s changing rules, your adaptability shines. You should lead as the president of real estate agents, representing our needs. Thank you for everything!

  • >